Darfur activists are much too polite about genocide

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:43, September 5, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Is this the right position name? Hard to tell)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) John Morlino
Source San Francisco Chronicle
Date September 3, 2006
URL http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/09/03/ING0TKT56V1.DTL
Quotes-start.png "Nothing, however, has garnered as much attention within the activist community as the latest scheme to deploy a U.N. security force in Darfur. This plan, which has been promoted by nearly every activist organization working on this issue, has an almost unimaginable fatal flaw: Without permission from the perpetrators of the atrocities, the peacekeepers will be staying home." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position United States should send peacekeepers on the topic Darfur conflict.