Difference between revisions of "Darfur activists are much too polite about genocide"

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Is this the right position name? Hard to tell)
 
(Better positions?)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
}}
 
}}
  
{{opinion|Darfur conflict|United States should send peacekeepers|for}}
+
{{opinion|Darfur conflict|United Nations should send peacekeepers|for}}
 +
{{opinion|Darfur conflict|NATO should intervene|for}}

Latest revision as of 03:44, October 3, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) John Morlino
Source San Francisco Chronicle
Date September 3, 2006
URL http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/09/03/ING0TKT56V1.DTL
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Nothing, however, has garnered as much attention within the activist community as the latest scheme to deploy a U.N. security force in Darfur. This plan, which has been promoted by nearly every activist organization working on this issue, has an almost unimaginable fatal flaw: Without permission from the perpetrators of the atrocities, the peacekeepers will be staying home." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United Nations should send peacekeepers on the topic Darfur conflict.


This item argues for the position NATO should intervene on the topic Darfur conflict.