Court ruling restricts choice, discounts health concerns

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:40, April 19, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) USA Today editorial board
Source USA Today
Date April 19, 2007
URL http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/04/post_58.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "A pregnant woman generally cannot learn whether a fetus she's carrying has a chromosomal defect such as Down syndrome, or another grave affliction, until after the 12th week of pregnancy. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court reached deeply into women's lives and took away one medical option they have had to deal with such a wrenching decision." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Gonzales v. Carhart.