Costs and Compassion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act') |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="Why does meaningful action on medical costs go along with compassion? One answer is that compassion means not closing your eyes to the human consequences of rising costs. When health insurance premiums doubled during the Bush years, our health care system “controlled costs” by dropping coverage for many workers — but as far as the Bush administration was concerned, that wasn’t a problem. If you believe in universal coverage, on the other hand, it is a problem, and demands a solution." | |quote="Why does meaningful action on medical costs go along with compassion? One answer is that compassion means not closing your eyes to the human consequences of rising costs. When health insurance premiums doubled during the Bush years, our health care system “controlled costs” by dropping coverage for many workers — but as far as the Bush administration was concerned, that wasn’t a problem. If you believe in universal coverage, on the other hand, it is a problem, and demands a solution." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion| | {{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should be passed|for}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:31, March 11, 2010
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | Paul Krugman | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | The New York Times | |||
| Date | July 24, 2009 | |||
| URL | http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/24/opinion/24krugman.html | |||
| Quote |
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.