Page values for "Cap and trade is wrong solution"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateJune 28, 2009 9:27:15 PM
_modificationDateJune 28, 2009 9:27:15 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The Denver Post editorial board |source=The Denver Post |date=June 26, 2009 |url=http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12691197 |quote="Fashioned to avoid appearing like a new tax, the measure nevertheless would work like one, as the higher costs of meeting the caps get passed on ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectCap and trade is wrong solution

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe Denver Post editorial board
SourceThe Denver Post
DateJune 26, 2009
URLhttp://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12691197
Quote"Fashioned to avoid appearing like a new tax, the measure nevertheless would work like one, as the higher costs of meeting the caps get passed on to consumers. The measure risks hurting our competitiveness globally without effectively lowering global greenhouse gases. Congress should instead consider a simpler carbon tax, creating a "nuclear-arms race" to harness atomic power to replace fossil fuels and provide incentives to speed new-energy innovation."
Summary

Cap and trade is wrong solution by The Denver Post editorial board (The Denver Post, June 26, 2009) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act
Position_fragmentAct should be passed
PositionAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act / Act should be passed
Position_link

Act should be passed

Stanceagainst