Cap-and-Trade: All Cost, No Benefit

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 23:09, June 28, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Martin Feldstein |source=The Washington Post |date=June 1, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/31/AR2009053102077.html |quote="A')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Martin Feldstein
Source The Washington Post
Date June 1, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/31/AR2009053102077.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Americans should ask themselves whether this annual tax of $1,600-plus per family is justified by the very small resulting decline in global CO2. Since the U.S. share of global CO2 production is now less than 25 percent (and is projected to decline as China and other developing nations grow), a 15 percent fall in U.S. CO2 output would lower global CO2 output by less than 4 percent. Its impact on global warming would be virtually unnoticeable." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic American Clean Energy and Security Act.