Bravo for Bolton: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Updated URL) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Item | ||
|author=David Limbaugh | |author=David Limbaugh | ||
|source=The Washington Times | |source=The Washington Times | ||
|date=August 5, 2006 | |date=August 5, 2006 | ||
|url=http:// | |url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20060804-091357-3096r.htm | ||
|quote="Perhaps the best reason to support John Bolton's confirmation as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations is that his approach to foreign policy is radically different from John Kerry's, as shown by their exchange during Mr. Bolton's confirmation hearings. It is a shame anyone missed this delicious slap-down." | |quote="Perhaps the best reason to support John Bolton's confirmation as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations is that his approach to foreign policy is radically different from John Kerry's, as shown by their exchange during Mr. Bolton's confirmation hearings. It is a shame anyone missed this delicious slap-down." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Bolton should be confirmed|for}} | |||
{{ |
Latest revision as of 07:31, December 3, 2007
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | David Limbaugh |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Times |
Date | August 5, 2006 |
URL | http://www3.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20060804-091357-3096r.htm |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.