Banning Logic

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 04:57, April 30, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Jacob Sullum |source=New York Post |date=April 29, 2007 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/04292007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/banning_logic_opedcolumnists_jacob_sullum.htm?pa...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jacob Sullum
Source New York Post
Date April 29, 2007
URL http://www.nypost.com/seven/04292007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/banning_logic_opedcolumnists_jacob_sullum.htm?page=0
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Such meddling is unconstitutional as well as unwise. The constitutional pretext for the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, as with so much else that Congress does, is the authority to regulate interstate commerce. But if an abortion qualifies as interstate commerce, it's hard to see how anything is beyond the federal government's purview." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Gonzales v. Carhart.