Another Rank Deal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act') |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="But pressure from the unions has now forced the White House to agree to raise the $23,000-per-household threshold of the tax slightly and - more importantly - exempt insurance plans that are the product of collective-bargaining agreements until 2018. This Labor Loophole stands in the finest tradition of the Louisiana Purchase and the Cornhusker Kickback. With no possible public-policy justification, it puts the awesome power to tax and spend at the service of nakedly political ends." | |quote="But pressure from the unions has now forced the White House to agree to raise the $23,000-per-household threshold of the tax slightly and - more importantly - exempt insurance plans that are the product of collective-bargaining agreements until 2018. This Labor Loophole stands in the finest tradition of the Louisiana Purchase and the Cornhusker Kickback. With no possible public-policy justification, it puts the awesome power to tax and spend at the service of nakedly political ends." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion| | {{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should be passed|against}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, March 11, 2010
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | Rich Lowry | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | New York Post | |||
| Date | January 15, 2010 | |||
| URL | http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/01/15/another_rank_deal_99912.html | |||
| Quote |
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.