Another Rank Deal: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|against}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|against}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|pro}}
{{Opinion|America's Choices Act of 2009|Act s be passed|pro}}

Revision as of 17:07, January 27, 2010

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Rich Lowry
Source New York Post
Date January 15, 2010
URL http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/01/15/another_rank_deal_99912.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But pressure from the unions has now forced the White House to agree to raise the $23,000-per-household threshold of the tax slightly and - more importantly - exempt insurance plans that are the product of collective-bargaining agreements until 2018. This Labor Loophole stands in the finest tradition of the Louisiana Purchase and the Cornhusker Kickback. With no possible public-policy justification, it puts the awesome power to tax and spend at the service of nakedly political ends." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.