Another Rank Deal: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Item |author=Rich Lowry |source=New York Post |date=January 15, 2010 |url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/01/15/another_rank_deal_99912.html |quote="But pressure...')
 
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|against}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|against}}
{{Opinion|America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009|Act should be passed|pro}}
{{Opinion}}

Revision as of 17:04, January 27, 2010

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Rich Lowry
Source New York Post
Date January 15, 2010
URL http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/01/15/another_rank_deal_99912.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But pressure from the unions has now forced the White House to agree to raise the $23,000-per-household threshold of the tax slightly and - more importantly - exempt insurance plans that are the product of collective-bargaining agreements until 2018. This Labor Loophole stands in the finest tradition of the Louisiana Purchase and the Cornhusker Kickback. With no possible public-policy justification, it puts the awesome power to tax and spend at the service of nakedly political ends." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.



This item addresses the topic .