Page values for "An empty amendment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | September 29, 2006 2:28:35 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | July 16, 2007 4:35:40 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{item |author=The Washington Times editorial board |source=The Washington Times |date=November 9, 2005 |url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20051108-102817-8909r.htm |quote="But what's most troubling is that the amendment likely would be interpreted as a zero-tolerance policy against all ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 2 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | An empty amendment |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 2,126 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 2,126 |
| _pageName | Page | An empty amendment |
| _pageTitle | String | An empty amendment |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | McCain Detainee Amendment | |
| Position_fragment | String | Amendment should be passed | |
| Position | Page | McCain Detainee Amendment / Amendment should be passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | The Washington Times editorial board |
| Source | Page | The Washington Times |
| Date | Date | November 9, 2005 |
| URL | URL | http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20051108-102817-8909r.htm |
| Quote | Text | "But what's most troubling is that the amendment likely would be interpreted as a zero-tolerance policy against all effective interrogation techniques, which explains the administration's resistance. After September 11, the president rightly determined that terrorists taken on the battlefield are not enemy combatants and therefore are not under the protections of the Geneva Conventions." |
| Summary | Wikitext | An empty amendment by The Washington Times editorial board (The Washington Times, November 9, 2005) (view) |