Page values for "Amy Coney Barrett and the confirmation process"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateOctober 26, 2020 11:52:17 PM
_modificationDateOctober 26, 2020 11:52:17 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board |source=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette |date=October 19, 2020 |url=https://www.beaconjournal.com/story/opinion/editorials/2020/10/19/editorial-supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-process/3713580001/ |quote=We are a long way from a Senate Judic ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectAmy Coney Barrett and the confirmation process

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorPittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board
SourcePittsburgh Post-Gazette
DateOctober 19, 2020
URLhttps://www.beaconjournal.com/story/opinion/editorials/2020/10/19/editorial-supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-process/3713580001/
QuoteWe are a long way from a Senate Judiciary Committee of dignity and deference. We are a long way from a moment like the one during Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s confirmation hearings when conservative Republican Orrin Hatch told then-Judge Ginsburg, “I admire you.” But we could get back to a serious process, based on goodwill and the probing of different judicial philosophies, if we wanted to.
Summary

Amy Coney Barrett and the confirmation process by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 19, 2020) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicAmy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination
Position_fragmentBarrett should be confirmed
PositionAmy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination / Barrett should be confirmed
Position_link

Barrett should be confirmed

Stancefor