Africa's Last Best Chance: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{Opinion|Doha round|Wealthy countries should cut farm subsidies|for}}
{{Opinion|Doha round|Wealthy countries should cut farm subsidies|for}}
{{Opinion|teste1|teste2|for}}
{{additional_author|Stuart Eizenstat}}
{{additional_author|Stuart Eizenstat}}

Revision as of 03:03, March 30, 2009

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Richard Holbrooke
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date February 15, 2007
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117150866048809457.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Two weeks ago the administration proposed ending subsidies for 80,000 wealthy farmers, substituting trade-distorting subsidies with cash payments to farmers, and trimming traditional agriculture programs by $4.5 billion over the next decade. These proposals, if approved, would directly benefit some of the poorest people on earth, save lives and ultimately reduce American foreign aid" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Wealthy countries should cut farm subsidies on the topic Doha round.



Author(s) [[{{{author}}}]]
Author(s) 2 (a field set by the form) {{{author 2}}}
URL
Quote (a textarea string)
Start date
Circulation (an integer)
Publication type (a multiple-value enumeration)
First name
Email address (an email)
Is nice (a boolean)