Africa's Last Best Chance: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{Item
|author=Richard Holbrooke
|author=Richard Holbrooke
|source=The Wall Street Journal
|source=The Wall Street Journal
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="Two weeks ago the administration proposed ending subsidies for 80,000 wealthy farmers, substituting trade-distorting subsidies with cash payments to farmers, and trimming traditional agriculture programs by $4.5 billion over the next decade. These proposals, if approved, would directly benefit some of the poorest people on earth, save lives and ultimately reduce American foreign aid"
|quote="Two weeks ago the administration proposed ending subsidies for 80,000 wealthy farmers, substituting trade-distorting subsidies with cash payments to farmers, and trimming traditional agriculture programs by $4.5 billion over the next decade. These proposals, if approved, would directly benefit some of the poorest people on earth, save lives and ultimately reduce American foreign aid"
}}
}}
{{Opinion|Doha round|Wealthy countries should cut farm subsidies|for}}
{{Opinion|teste1|teste2|for}}
{{additional_author|Stuart Eizenstat}}
{{additional_author|Stuart Eizenstat}}
{{opinion|Doha round|Wealthy countries should cut farm subsidies|for}}

Revision as of 03:01, March 30, 2009

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Richard Holbrooke
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date February 15, 2007
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117150866048809457.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Two weeks ago the administration proposed ending subsidies for 80,000 wealthy farmers, substituting trade-distorting subsidies with cash payments to farmers, and trimming traditional agriculture programs by $4.5 billion over the next decade. These proposals, if approved, would directly benefit some of the poorest people on earth, save lives and ultimately reduce American foreign aid" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Wealthy countries should cut farm subsidies on the topic Doha round.


This item argues for the position teste1 / teste2 on the topic teste1.



Author(s) [[{{{author}}}]]
Author(s) 2 (a field set by the form) {{{author 2}}}
URL
Quote (a textarea string)
Start date
Circulation (an integer)
Publication type (a multiple-value enumeration)
First name
Email address (an email)
Is nice (a boolean)