Abortion Goes Back to the People

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:50, July 20, 2022 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Wall Street Journal editorial board |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=June 24, 2022 |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-goes-back-to-the-people-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-dobbs-v-jackson-samuel-alito-11656107148 |quote=Critics say the Court's 6-3 decision in ''Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization'' is rule by unelected judges. But Roe was the real "exercise of raw judicial power," as Justice Byron White put it in dissent in 1973. Tha...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Wall Street Journal editorial board
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date June 24, 2022
URL https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-goes-back-to-the-people-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-dobbs-v-jackson-samuel-alito-11656107148
Quote
Quotes-start.png Critics say the Court's 6-3 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is rule by unelected judges. But Roe was the real "exercise of raw judicial power," as Justice Byron White put it in dissent in 1973. That's when seven Justices claimed to find a constitutional right to abortion that is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution and had no history in American common law. The Court on Friday finally corrected its mistake, which has damaged the legitimacy of the Court and inflamed our politics for 49 years. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.