Page values for "Abortion Goes Back to the People"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJuly 20, 2022 2:50:16 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJuly 20, 2022 2:50:16 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=The Wall Street Journal editorial board |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=June 24, 2022 |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-goes-back-to-the-people-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-dobbs-v-jackson-samuel-alito-11656107148 |quote=Critics say the Court's 6-3 decision in ''Dobbs v. Ja ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringAbortion Goes Back to the People
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger14,286
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger14,286
_pageNamePageAbortion Goes Back to the People
_pageTitleString

Abortion Goes Back to the People

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Wall Street Journal editorial board
SourcePageThe Wall Street Journal
DateDateJune 24, 2022
URLURLhttps://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-goes-back-to-the-people-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-dobbs-v-jackson-samuel-alito-11656107148
QuoteTextCritics say the Court's 6-3 decision in ''Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization'' is rule by unelected judges. But Roe was the real "exercise of raw judicial power," as Justice Byron White put it in dissent in 1973. That's when seven Justices claimed to find a constitutional right to abortion that is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution and had no history in American common law. The Court on Friday finally corrected its mistake, which has damaged the legitimacy of the Court and inflamed our politics for 49 years.
SummaryWikitext

Abortion Goes Back to the People by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, June 24, 2022) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor