A grim sign for ObamaCare

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:17, March 29, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=New York Post editorial board |source=New York Post |date=March 29, 2010 |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/grim_sign_for_obamacare_nmwL14T53evpw...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New York Post editorial board
Source New York Post
Date March 29, 2010
URL http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/grim_sign_for_obamacare_nmwL14T53evpw8DGK9xEEI
Quotes-start.png "For the first time, Social Security will pay out more in benefits than it receives in tax revenue, to the tune of $29 billion. [...] So is this really the time for the US to be setting out on a trillion-dollar entitlement adventure filled with so many unknowns and untested elements? And, more important, whose ultimate financial impact on the sky-high -- and still soaring -- national debt is open to so much question? You'd think not." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.