A food bill, not a farm bill

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 11:51, December 20, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=The Boston Globe editorial board |source=The Boston Globe |date=November 7, 2007 |url=http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2007/11/07/a_foo...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Boston Globe editorial board
Source The Boston Globe
Date November 7, 2007
URL http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2007/11/07/a_food_bill_not_a_farm_bill/
Quotes-start.png "Indiana's Richard Lugar and New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg want to stop the costly practice of subsidizing wheat, corn, soy, cotton, and rice crops even when prices are high, as they are now. Their bill, to be offered in the Senate this week, would switch to a government system of revenue insurance, premium-free for both ranchers and farmers, including vegetable and fruit growers who now get little benefit from the farm bill." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Bill should be passed on the topic 2007 U.S. Farm Bill.