A defeat for Bolton could undercut US policy

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 18:02, September 1, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Thomas M. Boyd
Source The Boston Globe
Date August 1, 2006
URL http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/01/a_defeat_for_bolton_could_undercut_us_policy/
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Do Bolton's opponents really believe that defeating him, and thereby vacating the seat he occupies on the UN Security Council, will actually advance US interests in the region?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.


This item argues against the position Confirmation should be filibustered on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.