A defeat for Bolton could undercut US policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Punchier quote) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Oops, how did that happen?) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|date=August 1, 2006 | |date=August 1, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/01/a_defeat_for_bolton_could_undercut_us_policy/ | |url=http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/01/a_defeat_for_bolton_could_undercut_us_policy/ | ||
|quote=" | |quote="Indeed, most of the criticism aimed at Bolton has nothing to do with him. More than anything else, it represents an effort to set the political stage for the upcoming midterm congressional elections in November." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Bolton should be confirmed|for}} | {{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Bolton should be confirmed|for}} | ||
{{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Confirmation should be filibustered|against}} | {{opinion|Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006|Confirmation should be filibustered|against}} |
Revision as of 01:18, September 6, 2006
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Thomas M. Boyd |
---|---|
Source | The Boston Globe |
Date | August 1, 2006 |
URL | http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/01/a_defeat_for_bolton_could_undercut_us_policy/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.
This item argues against the position Confirmation should be filibustered on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.