A dangerous gamble in Gaza

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:40, July 14, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Text replace - '2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict' to 'Gaza War')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Financial Times editorial board
Source Financial Times
Date January 4, 2009
URL http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e56ac646-da93-11dd-8c28-000077b07658.html
Quotes-start.png "What is urgently needed now is: an internationally monitored ceasefire, of sufficient duration to resume and conclude negotiations on that basis; for Israel then to lift the blockade; and for new elections to decide who speaks for the Palestinians – Fatah, whose position is fast being eroded by this crisis, Hamas, or a combination of them both." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic Gaza War.