A dangerous gamble in Gaza

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 21:48, January 5, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Text replace - '2008 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was justified in its attacks' to '2008-2009 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was right to attack Gaza')
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Financial Times editorial board
Source Financial Times
Date January 4, 2009
URL http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e56ac646-da93-11dd-8c28-000077b07658.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "What is urgently needed now is: an internationally monitored ceasefire, of sufficient duration to resume and conclude negotiations on that basis; for Israel then to lift the blockade; and for new elections to decide who speaks for the Palestinians – Fatah, whose position is fast being eroded by this crisis, Hamas, or a combination of them both." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic 2008-2009 Israel–Gaza conflict.