Difference between revisions of "A dangerous gamble in Gaza"

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replace - '2008-2009' to '2008–2009')
m (Text replace - '2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict' to 'Gaza War')
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|quote="What is urgently needed now is: an internationally monitored ceasefire, of sufficient duration to resume and conclude negotiations on that basis; for Israel then to lift the blockade; and for new elections to decide who speaks for the Palestinians – Fatah, whose position is fast being eroded by this crisis, Hamas, or a combination of them both."
 
|quote="What is urgently needed now is: an internationally monitored ceasefire, of sufficient duration to resume and conclude negotiations on that basis; for Israel then to lift the blockade; and for new elections to decide who speaks for the Palestinians – Fatah, whose position is fast being eroded by this crisis, Hamas, or a combination of them both."
 
}}
 
}}
{{Opinion|2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict|Israel was right to attack Gaza|against}}
+
{{Opinion|Gaza War|Israel was right to attack Gaza|against}}

Latest revision as of 17:40, July 14, 2009

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Financial Times editorial board
Source Financial Times
Date January 4, 2009
URL http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e56ac646-da93-11dd-8c28-000077b07658.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "What is urgently needed now is: an internationally monitored ceasefire, of sufficient duration to resume and conclude negotiations on that basis; for Israel then to lift the blockade; and for new elections to decide who speaks for the Palestinians – Fatah, whose position is fast being eroded by this crisis, Hamas, or a combination of them both." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic Gaza War.