Page values for "A Victory for Law"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeSeptember 18, 2006 4:47:29 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeSeptember 17, 2008 1:21:38 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=June 30, 2006 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/29/AR2006062901779.html |quote="Now, however, balancing these concerns against the accused's rights to a fair trial will not be th ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger3
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringA Victory for Law
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger1,963
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger1,963
_pageNamePageA Victory for Law
_pageTitleString

A Victory for Law

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageHamdan v. Rumsfeld
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageHamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Washington Post editorial board
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateJune 30, 2006
URLURLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/29/AR2006062901779.html
QuoteText"Now, however, balancing these concerns against the accused's rights to a fair trial will not be the sole province of the administration itself but a shared responsibility of the executive and legislative branches. The results will bear the mark of democratic legitimacy: They will be law."
SummaryWikitext

A Victory for Law by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, June 30, 2006) (view)