A Strong Health Reform Bill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=July 15, 2009 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/opinion/16thu1.html |quote="This bill is c') |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' to 'Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act') |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="This bill is clearly not hugely costly. It would expand the government’s role in financing and regulating coverage but would also bolster private coverage. It would increase employer-based coverage, mostly by requiring employers to participate. And it would send more clients to the private insurance industry. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that perhaps 10 million people might enroll in a new public plan, while twice that number might enroll in competing private policies." | |quote="This bill is clearly not hugely costly. It would expand the government’s role in financing and regulating coverage but would also bolster private coverage. It would increase employer-based coverage, mostly by requiring employers to participate. And it would send more clients to the private insurance industry. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that perhaps 10 million people might enroll in a new public plan, while twice that number might enroll in competing private policies." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion| | {{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should be passed|for}} |
Latest revision as of 14:30, March 11, 2010
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | The New York Times editorial board |
---|---|
Source | The New York Times |
Date | July 15, 2009 |
URL | http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/opinion/16thu1.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.