A Solution for Trials: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Legislation now has name)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|President Bush's proposed legislation on detainees|Legislation should be passed|against}}
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|against}}
{{opinion|President Bush's proposed legislation on detainees|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|for}}
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed|for}}

Latest revision as of 19:53, September 17, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date September 9, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090801554.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "President Bush is pushing aggressively for quick action on his bill. But the Senate needs to work from its own, far better, draft -- which, with relatively few changes, could provide a sound legislative basis for fair and orderly trials." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.


This item argues for the position Competing Graham-McCain-Warner bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.