A Retreat on Rationing Free Speech?

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:49, January 1, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) George F. Will
Source The Washington Post
Date December 31, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/29/AR2006122901419.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Bauer wonders why, absent a compelling government interest in combating corruption, unregulated speech resulting in influence should be a federal offense. When, as surely it will, the Supreme Court considers that question, it can begin undoing the damage it did at the time it affirmed McCain-Feingold and licensed government to ration political speech." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be repealed on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.