Page values for "A Case for Appeal"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeSeptember 26, 2006 2:48:18 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeSeptember 26, 2006 2:48:18 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=September 26, 2006 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/25/AR2006092501300.html |quote="The compromise bill strips the courts of any jurisdiction to hear cases -- including those ca ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringA Case for Appeal
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger2,071
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger2,071
_pageNamePageA Case for Appeal
_pageTitleString

A Case for Appeal

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageMilitary Commissions Act of 2006
Position_fragmentStringCompromise bill should be passed
PositionPageMilitary Commissions Act of 2006 / Compromise bill should be passed
Position_linkWikitext

Compromise bill should be passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Washington Post editorial board
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateSeptember 26, 2006
URLURLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/25/AR2006092501300.html
QuoteText"The compromise bill strips the courts of any jurisdiction to hear cases -- including those cases already pending -- concerning detainee treatment. Unless this provision is changed, the administration will be free to ignore Mr. McCain's interpretation."
SummaryWikitext

A Case for Appeal by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, September 26, 2006) (view)