Page values for "'No-fly zone' is a euphemism for war. We'd be mad to try it"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeMarch 14, 2011 1:02:41 AM
_modificationDateDatetimeMarch 14, 2011 1:03:03 AM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Simon Jenkins, |source=The Guardian |date=March 9, 2011 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/09/david-cameron-no-fly-zone-libya |quote=But unless we redefine words, [Gaddafi] is not committing genocide and his brutality is hardly exceptional. If the r ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger2
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectString'No-fly zone' is a euphemism for war. We'd be mad to try it
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger7,483
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger7,483
_pageNamePage'No-fly zone' is a euphemism for war. We'd be mad to try it
_pageTitleString

'No-fly zone' is a euphemism for war. We'd be mad to try it

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPage2011 Libyan uprising
Position_fragmentStringUnited States should impose a no-fly zone
PositionPage2011 Libyan uprising / United States should impose a no-fly zone
Position_linkWikitext

United States should impose a no-fly zone

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Simon Jenkins
SourcePageThe Guardian
DateDateMarch 9, 2011
URLURLhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/09/david-cameron-no-fly-zone-libya
QuoteTextBut unless we redefine words, [Gaddafi] is not committing genocide and his brutality is hardly exceptional. If the rebels win it should be their victory, emerging from a new balance of power inside Libya. If they fail, they must fight another day. There is no good reason for us to intervene.
SummaryWikitext

'No-fly zone' is a euphemism for war. We'd be mad to try it by Simon Jenkins (The Guardian, March 9, 2011) (view)