"Big, Beautiful Bill" finally tackles entitlement reform

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:27, October 14, 2025 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Detroit News editorial board |source=The Detroit News |date=July 12, 2025 |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2025/07/12/editorial-big-beautiful-bill-finally-tackles-entitlement-reform/84541898007/ |quote=This is the kind of serious entitlement reform that has been long necessary. Medicaid spending was about $880 billion in fiscal year 2023, with $606 billion coming from federal contributions and the rest from the states. That is...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Detroit News editorial board
Source The Detroit News
Date July 12, 2025
URL https://www.detroitnews.com/story/opinion/editorials/2025/07/12/editorial-big-beautiful-bill-finally-tackles-entitlement-reform/84541898007/
Quote
This is the kind of serious entitlement reform that has been long necessary. Medicaid spending was about $880 billion in fiscal year 2023, with $606 billion coming from federal contributions and the rest from the states. That is unsustainable. The new work requirements will reduce spending by $326 billion over 10 years. Preserving the program for the disabled, elderly and other vulnerable populations who truly need it is essential, and the reforms make that possible.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should not have been passed on the topic One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=%22Big,_Beautiful_Bill%22_finally_tackles_entitlement_reform&oldid=37929"