Boumediene v. Bush

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Boumediene v. Bush"

This is a topic, with start date December 5, 2007 and end date June 12, 2008.

Its theme(s) are Terrorism, War.

Summary of positions for this topic[edit]

Full listing[edit]

Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

For
Against


All items that address this topic (15 total)[edit]

Title Author Source Date
Supreme arrogance New York Daily News editorial board New York Daily News 2008-06-12
The Jihad Five Investor's Business Daily editorial board Investor's Business Daily 2008-06-12
A rebuked Bush San Francisco Chronicle editorial board San Francisco Chronicle 2008-06-13
An inexplicable power grab Richard Samp USA Today 2008-06-13
Habeas for Guantanamo detainees Los Angeles Times editorial board Los Angeles Times 2008-06-13
Justice 5, Brutality 4 The New York Times editorial board The New York Times 2008-06-13
Latest Guantanamo ruling reaffirms American values USA Today editorial board USA Today 2008-06-13
President Kennedy The Wall Street Journal editorial board The Wall Street Journal 2008-06-13
Supreme Court blots a stain The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board The Philadelphia Inquirer 2008-06-13
Supreme Disgrace Peter Wehner National Review 2008-06-13
The Justices' Refrain The Washington Post editorial board The Washington Post 2008-06-13
Contempt Of Courts George F. Will The Washington Post 2008-06-17
The Supreme Court Goes to War John Yoo The Wall Street Journal 2008-06-17
We'll Rue Having Judges on the Battlefield Andrew McBride The Wall Street Journal 2008-06-21
The Enemy Detainee Mess The Wall Street Journal editorial board The Wall Street Journal 2008-07-03