What kind of rogue-state dialogue?: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Another position)
 
Line 8: Line 8:


{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should negotiate with Iran|mixed}}
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should negotiate with Iran|mixed}}
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should negotiate with Syria|mixed}}

Latest revision as of 17:37, November 24, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Times editorial board
Source The Washington Times
Date November 22, 2006
URL http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-iran21nov21,0,3834399.story
Quote
Quotes-start.png "While talks with Tehran and Damascus are unlikely to achieve very much, we have no objection in principle to the idea of talking to these governments. After all, to paraphrase Henry Kissinger, it makes little sense to talk only with people that we agree with. The real question is whether expanding dialogue with either of these governments is likely to yield peace or freedom in Iraq" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should negotiate with Iran on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.


This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should negotiate with Syria on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.