Washington’s Options on Libya

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 18:05, March 13, 2011 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Text replace - "enforce a no-fly zone" to "impose a no-fly zone")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date March 8, 2011
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/opinion/09wed1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png There is more that the United States and its allies can do right now. NATO has expanded its air surveillance over Libya from 10 hours to 24 hours a day to gather information on Libyan troop movements. It should find a way to share relevant information with the rebels. Without firing a shot, it can sow confusion among Libyan forces by jamming their communications. All of the big states need to agree on ways to enforce the United Nations-imposed arms embargo. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should impose a no-fly zone on the topic 2011 Libyan uprising.