Unions' 'card check' needs reality check

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:13, June 25, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Chicago Sun-Times editorial board |source=Chicago Sun-Times |date=June 21, 2007 |url=http://www.suntimes.com/news/commentary/437224,CST-EDT-edits21a.article |quote="And how ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Chicago Sun-Times editorial board
Source Chicago Sun-Times
Date June 21, 2007
URL http://www.suntimes.com/news/commentary/437224,CST-EDT-edits21a.article
Quotes-start.png "And how do the unions, and union-backed supporters of the egregious Employee Free Choice Act [...] propose to protect workers from intimidation and harassment? By overturning employees' right to secret ballots in deciding whether to unionize and replacing that long-ingrained feature of American democracy with a "card check" method by which union organizers collect signatures on cards in public and every employee's choice would be known." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Employee Free Choice Act.