USA Today editorial board
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is the editorial board of USA Today.
Political affiliation: Liberal
Items by this editorial board:
- 'Buy American' provisions offer recipe for retaliation (Topic: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Position: Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed, Stance: for)
- Abbas' bid for statehood will hurt Palestinians (Topic: 2011 United Nations recognition vote of Palestinian state, Position: United Nations should vote to recognize a Palestinian state, Stance: against)
- After 9 years, time for troops to leave Iraq (Topic: Post-invasion Iraq, Position: Coalition troops should pull out, Stance: for)
- Amnesty? What amnesty? Critics substitute fear for facts (Topic: Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: mixed)
- As health law turns 2, the demonization continues (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: against)
- Bailout won't cure what ails Big Three (Topic: Economic crisis of 2008, Position: United States should bail out the automobile industry, Stance: against)
- Biden's Afghanistan horror: A well-intentioned miscalculation with disastrous, predictable results (Topic: Withdrawal of United States troops from Afghanistan (2020–2021), Position: Withdrawal was justified, Stance: mixed)
- Biden's Afghanistan horror: A well-intentioned miscalculation with disastrous, predictable results (Topic: Withdrawal of United States troops from Afghanistan (2020–2021), Position: Withdrawal was poorly executed, Stance: for)
- Bush gives bogus answers to the $83,000 question (Topic: State Children's Health Insurance Program, Position: Program should be expanded, Stance: for)
- Counter Gadhafi with coordinated response (Topic: 2011 Libyan uprising, Position: United States should impose a no-fly zone, Stance: against)
- Court ruling restricts choice, discounts health concerns (Topic: Gonzales v. Carhart, Position: Supreme Court was correct in its ruling, Stance: against)
- Down on the farm, it's business as usual (Topic: 2007 U.S. Farm Bill, Position: Bill should be passed, Stance: against)
- Elect Joe Biden. Reject Donald Trump. (Topic: 2020 United States presidential election, Position: Biden should be elected, Stance: for)
- Elect Joe Biden. Reject Donald Trump. (Topic: 2020 United States presidential election, Position: Trump should be elected, Stance: against)
- Five ways to improve the health care hybrid (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: mixed)
- Fixing Puerto Rico (Topic: Puerto Rican government-debt crisis, Position: Puerto Rico should be allowed to declare bankruptcy, Stance: for)
- Fixing Puerto Rico (Topic: Puerto Rican government-debt crisis, Position: Puerto Rico should be managed by a financial control board, Stance: for)
- Ghost of '86 failure haunts bid for immigration reform (Topic: Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: mixed)
- GOP greets stimulus bill with ‘audacity of nope’ (Topic: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: for)
- GOP poisons ObamaCare, then claims it's sick (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: against)
- Health care 'temper tantrum' could punish GOP (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: against)
- High Court opens door for wealthy interest groups (Topic: Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, Position: Supreme Court was right to strike down "Wellstone Amendment", Stance: mixed)
- Iran's double talk leaves U.S., allies plenty of bad options (Topic: Iranian nuclear crisis, Position: Economic sanctions should be imposed on Iran, Stance: for)
- Iran's double talk leaves U.S., allies plenty of bad options (Topic: Iranian nuclear crisis, Position: United States should attack Iran, Stance: mixed)
- Iran's double talk leaves U.S., allies plenty of bad options (Topic: Iranian nuclear crisis, Position: United States should negotiate with Iran, Stance: for)
- Is China ready to negotiate? Donald Trump has no clue on how to deliver a trade deal. (Topic: China–United States trade war, Position: Trade war is good for the United States, Stance: against)
- Is Iran nuclear deal better than no deal? Yes (Topic: Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Position: Plan is beneficial, Stance: for)
- Israel's assault on flotilla hands its enemies a victory (Topic: Gaza flotilla raid, Position: Israel was justified in its actions, Stance: against)
- Israel’s tactics in Gaza invite Palestinian backlash (Topic: Gaza War, Position: Israel was right to attack Gaza, Stance: mixed)
- Keystone's just another pipeline (Topic: Keystone XL pipeline, Position: Pipeline should be built, Stance: for)
- Landmark health vote aids millions, leaves tough choices (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: mixed)
- Latest Guantanamo ruling reaffirms American values (Topic: Boumediene v. Bush, Position: Supreme Court was correct in its ruling, Stance: for)
- Libyan rebels cheer, but story not over (Topic: 2011 Libyan uprising, Position: United States should not have intervened, Stance: against)
- Mend Obamacare, don't end it (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: mixed)
- New push for 'fair trade' puts U.S. economy at risk (Topic: Colombia-United States Free Trade Agreement, Position: Agreement should be ratified, Stance: for)
- New push for 'fair trade' puts U.S. economy at risk (Topic: Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement, Position: Agreement should be ratified, Stance: for)
- No way to form a union (Topic: Employee Free Choice Act, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: against)
- No-fly zone in Libya holds more risks than rewards (Topic: 2011 Libyan uprising, Position: United States should impose a no-fly zone, Stance: against)
- North Korea's nuclear test puts onus on China, S. Korea (Topic: North Korean nuclear crisis, Position: China should pressure North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions, Stance: for)
- North Korea's nuclear test puts onus on China, S. Korea (Topic: North Korean nuclear crisis, Position: Economic sanctions should be placed on North Korea, Stance: for)
- North Korea's nuclear test puts onus on China, S. Korea (Topic: North Korean nuclear crisis, Position: South Korea should pressure North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions, Stance: for)
- Obama recalibrates on Iraq, and that's as it should be (Topic: Post-invasion Iraq, Position: Coalition troops should pull out, Stance: against)
- Obamacare remains worthy (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: against)
- Opening bids on health care contain good ideas, big costs (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: mixed)
- Override Keystone pipeline veto (Topic: Keystone XL pipeline, Position: Pipeline should be built, Stance: for)
- Paris pullout endangers the planet (Topic: United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Position: United States was right to withdraw, Stance: against)
- Pass the Colombia pact (Topic: Colombia-United States Free Trade Agreement, Position: Agreement should be ratified, Stance: for)
- Phony urgency on vote fraud (Topic: Federal Election Integrity Act, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: against)
- Plan to protect kids' health spawns needless veto fight (Topic: State Children's Health Insurance Program, Position: Program should be expanded, Stance: for)
- Poorest Americans have waited too long for a raise (Topic: Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: for)
- Ruling reflects America's ambivalence on guns (Topic: District of Columbia v. Heller, Position: Supreme Court was correct in its ruling, Stance: for)
- Setback for equal education (Topic: Parents v. Seattle, Position: Supreme Court was correct in its ruling, Stance: against)
- Show Putin the high cost of conquest (Topic: 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine, Position: Economic sanctions should be imposed on Russia, Stance: for)
- Suing Arizona hurts chances for immigration overhaul (Topic: United States of America v. Arizona, Position: Lawsuit was justified, Stance: against)
- Supreme Court ObamaCare ruling benefits millions (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: against)
- Surge's success holds chance to seize the moment in Iraq (Topic: Post-invasion Iraq, Position: Coalition troops should pull out, Stance: against)
- Syrian chemical attack demands precise strike (Topic: Syrian civil war, Position: United States should depose Bashar Assad, Stance: against)
- Syrian chemical attack demands precise strike (Topic: Syrian civil war, Position: United States should intervene, Stance: for)
- Trump is 'unfit for the presidency' (Topic: United States presidential election, 2016, Position: Donald Trump should be elected, Stance: against)
- U.S.-Iran collision course calls for diplomatic brakes (Topic: Iranian nuclear crisis, Position: United States should attack Iran, Stance: against)
- U.S.-Iran collision course calls for diplomatic brakes (Topic: Iranian nuclear crisis, Position: United States should negotiate with Iran, Stance: for)
- Uphold historic values (Topic: Military Commissions Act of 2006, Position: Act should be overturned, Stance: for)
- Vote no on Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation (Topic: Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination, Position: Kavanaugh should be confirmed, Stance: against)
- Wiretap ruling affirms that presidents aren't monarchs (Topic: NSA warrantless surveillance controversy, Position: Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional, Stance: for)