Too little in return for stimulus plan

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:24, February 13, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=February 13, 2009 |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-stimulus13-2009feb13,0,3081419.story |quot...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source Los Angeles Times
Date February 13, 2009
URL http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-stimulus13-2009feb13,0,3081419.story
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Among the final bill's provisions are several with a strong record of stimulating spending, such as extended unemployment benefits and increased investments in highways and public transit. We also welcome farsighted proposals for promoting broadband Internet access, high-speed rail and a modernized electrical grid. But the version worked out by the White House and congressional leaders serves as a case study for the time-worn notion that haste makes waste." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position Act should be passed on the topic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.