Three Bad Rulings

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:17, June 26, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 26, 2007 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/opinion/26tue1.html |quote="The decision contained a...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date June 26, 2007
URL http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/opinion/26tue1.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The decision contained a lot of pious language about protecting free speech. But magnifying the voice of wealthy corporations and unions over the voice of candidates and private citizens is hardly a free speech victory." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was right to strike down "Wellstone Amendment" on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.