Page values for "Three Bad Rulings"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateJune 26, 2007 12:17:09 PM
_modificationDateJune 26, 2007 12:17:09 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 26, 2007 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/opinion/26tue1.html |quote="The decision contained a lot of pious language about protecting free speech. But magnifying the voice of wealthy corporations and u ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectThree Bad Rulings

"_fileData" values

"Opinions" values

TopicBipartisan Campaign Reform Act
Position_fragmentSupreme Court was right to strike down "Wellstone Amendment"
PositionBipartisan Campaign Reform Act / Supreme Court was right to strike down "Wellstone Amendment"
Position_link

Supreme Court was right to strike down "Wellstone Amendment"

Stanceagainst

"Items" values

AuthorThe New York Times editorial board
SourceThe New York Times
DateJune 26, 2007
URLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/opinion/26tue1.html
Quote"The decision contained a lot of pious language about protecting free speech. But magnifying the voice of wealthy corporations and unions over the voice of candidates and private citizens is hardly a free speech victory."
Summary

Three Bad Rulings by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, June 26, 2007) (view)