Thought money could buy an American election? You ain't seen nothin' yet

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 01:53, April 9, 2014 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Gary Younge |source=The Guardian |date=April 6, 2014 |url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/06/money-bought-elections-us-donation-rules |quote=I...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Gary Younge
Source The Guardian
Date April 6, 2014
URL http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/06/money-bought-elections-us-donation-rules
Quote
Quotes-start.png In a system where money is considered speech, and corporations are people, this trend is inevitable. Elections become not a system of participatory engagement determining how the country is run, but the best democratic charade that money can buy. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court voted correctly on the topic McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Thought_money_could_buy_an_American_election%3F_You_ain%27t_seen_nothin%27_yet&oldid=17431"