Difference between revisions of "They Liked It When It Was McCain's Idea"

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(Added Hamdan v. Rumsfeld)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
}}
 
}}
  
 +
{{opinion|Hamdan v. Rumsfeld|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|against}}
 
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|for}}
 
{{opinion|Military Commissions Act of 2006|Act should be passed|for}}
 
{{reference|Stampeding Congress}}
 
{{reference|Stampeding Congress}}

Latest revision as of 16:33, September 18, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) John Hinderaker
Source Power Line
Date September 16, 2006
URL http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015291.php
Quote
Quotes-start.png "[The act] is a painstakingly conscientious effort to establish a system of military tribunals that will satisfy Hamdan. The statute is some 86 pages long; I would highly recommend that you at least skim it to gain some impression of the good faith with which the administration has tried to follow Hamdan's misguided mandate." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.


This item refers to the previous opinion item Stampeding Congress.