There Are Better Ways to Insure Kids

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 18:30, October 21, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Grace-Marie Turner |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=October 18, 2007 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119267198215362982.html |quote="Already, two-thirds of childre...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Grace-Marie Turner
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date October 18, 2007
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119267198215362982.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Already, two-thirds of children who do not have health insurance are eligible for federal help through either Schip or Medicaid. Congress's first priority should be to make sure these poorer, uninsured children are taken care of. Yet states have struggled to get these children enrolled, which means that if there is a stampede to add higher-income kids to Schip, the poorer kids will likely continue to get left behind." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Program should be expanded on the topic State Children's Health Insurance Program.