The Non-Intervention War

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 02:38, May 17, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Wall Street Journal editorial board, |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=May 7, 2013 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788732337250457846678...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Wall Street Journal editorial board
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date May 7, 2013
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323372504578466783346309210.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png The biggest difference now, compared to two years ago, is that the Syrian war is also evolving into a regional Sunni-Shiite conflict that is helping al Qaeda. The Islamist al-Nusra front has become the strongest rebel force in Syria, thanks to the U.S. refusal to help other rebels. These al Qaeda allies aim to establish a caliphate in Damascus and are already helping to revive sectarian strife in Iraq. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.