The Employee Free Choice Act should be renamed the Faux Choice Act

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 03:50, March 23, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Bruce Ramsey |source=The Seattle Times |date=March 17, 2009 |url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008876528_opina18ramsey.html |quote="I prefer the p...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Bruce Ramsey
Source The Seattle Times
Date March 17, 2009
URL http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008876528_opina18ramsey.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "I prefer the pre-1935 rule: Unions represented the people who joined them. That world is often portrayed as anti-union, but it allowed the rise of famous unions, from Dave Beck's Teamsters to Bill Haywood's Industrial Workers of the World. In those days, unions had to struggle to gain workers' allegiance and also to keep it. It made them tough and vital." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Employee Free Choice Act.