Page values for "The Constitution Trumps Arizona"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJuly 13, 2010 11:43:26 AM
_modificationDateDatetimeJuly 13, 2010 11:43:26 AM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=July 7, 2010 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/08/opinion/08thu1.html |quote="The Supreme Court has said federal authority can pre-empt state law when the federal interest is dominant and where there already ex ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringThe Constitution Trumps Arizona
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger6,612
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger6,612
_pageNamePageThe Constitution Trumps Arizona
_pageTitleString

The Constitution Trumps Arizona

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageUnited States of America v. Arizona
Position_fragmentStringLawsuit was justified
PositionPageUnited States of America v. Arizona / Lawsuit was justified
Position_linkWikitext

Lawsuit was justified

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The New York Times editorial board
SourcePageThe New York Times
DateDateJuly 7, 2010
URLURLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/08/opinion/08thu1.html
QuoteText"The Supreme Court has said federal authority can pre-empt state law when the federal interest is dominant and where there already exists a system of federal regulations. The government has done a poor job enforcing its immigration rules, to say the least, but they do exist, and clearly fall under what the Constitution calls “the supreme law of the land.”"
SummaryWikitext

The Constitution Trumps Arizona by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, July 7, 2010) (view)