Page values for "The Case against the Dodd Bill"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | April 27, 2010 7:36:54 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | April 27, 2010 7:36:54 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=National Review editorial board |source=National Review |date=April 26, 2010 |url=http://article.nationalreview.com/432504/the-case-against-the-dodd-bill/the-editors |quote="The sophisticated creditors of non-banks, however, neither need nor deserve a bailout. The Dodd bill would ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | The Case against the Dodd Bill |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 6,279 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 6,279 |
| _pageName | Page | The Case against the Dodd Bill |
| _pageTitle | String | The Case against the Dodd Bill |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Restoring American Financial Stability Act | |
| Position_fragment | String | Act should be passed | |
| Position | Page | Restoring American Financial Stability Act / Act should be passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | National Review editorial board |
| Source | Page | National Review |
| Date | Date | April 26, 2010 |
| URL | URL | http://article.nationalreview.com/432504/the-case-against-the-dodd-bill/the-editors |
| Quote | Text | "The sophisticated creditors of non-banks, however, neither need nor deserve a bailout. The Dodd bill would not require the FDIC to impose losses on these creditors; it only expresses a “strong presumption” that such losses would be imposed. As structured, this authority would allow the government to bail out non-bank creditors, and worse, to play favorites among them, just as we saw when the Obama administration gift-wrapped large stakes in the automakers for its union allies at the expense of secured creditors." |
| Summary | Wikitext | The Case against the Dodd Bill by National Review editorial board (National Review, April 26, 2010) (view) |