The 'Free Choice' Act Is Anything But

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 05:27, May 8, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=George McGovern |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=May 7, 2009 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124165379013293871.html |quote="Many labor contracts can run')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) George McGovern
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date May 7, 2009
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124165379013293871.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Many labor contracts can run over 100 pages with their requirements of each party. Compulsory arbitration is, in one sense, government dictating to employees what they will win or lose in the deal, with no opportunity to approve the "agreement." Why should employees pay union dues to get such a contract?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Employee Free Choice Act.