Syria: The case for No

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:17, September 6, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Chicago Tribune editorial board, |source=Chicago Tribune |date=September 6, 2013 |url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-syria-20130...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Chicago Tribune editorial board
Source Chicago Tribune
Date September 6, 2013
URL http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-syria-20130906,0,3581601.story
Quote
Quotes-start.png Most important, Obama has to explain what he expects after missiles devastate Syrian targets: Would U.S. assaults shorten this civil war and its suffering? Or would strikes risk regional warfare and new waves of refugees? Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.