Page values for "Save Benghazi"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeMarch 18, 2011 4:09:15 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeMarch 18, 2011 4:09:15 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=National Review editorial board, |source=National Review |date=March 16, 2011 |url=http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/262203/save-benghazi-editors |quote=We initially opposed a no-fly zone, but circumstances have changed. We should establish both a no-fly zone and a no-drive zone ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringSave Benghazi
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger7,495
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger7,495
_pageNamePageSave Benghazi
_pageTitleString

Save Benghazi

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPage2011 Libyan uprising
Position_fragmentStringUnited States should impose a no-fly zone
PositionPage2011 Libyan uprising / United States should impose a no-fly zone
Position_linkWikitext

United States should impose a no-fly zone

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,National Review editorial board
SourcePageNational Review
DateDateMarch 16, 2011
URLURLhttp://www.nationalreview.com/articles/262203/save-benghazi-editors
QuoteTextWe initially opposed a no-fly zone, but circumstances have changed. We should establish both a no-fly zone and a no-drive zone in the approach to the de facto rebel capital of Benghazi to prevent Qaddafi’s armored vehicles from entering the city. The no-fly zone is unlikely to tip the military balance in itself, but Qaddafi’s air force has been a factor in his fight against the rebels. Coupling a no-fly zone with an effort to stop his advance on the ground should save Benghazi and allow the rebels time to recoup.
SummaryWikitext

Save Benghazi by National Review editorial board (National Review, March 16, 2011) (view)