Sanctions with sense

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 03:13, July 10, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board |source=Los Angeles Times |date=July 9, 2007 |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-iran9jul09,0,4961253.story |quote="There is lit...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source Los Angeles Times
Date July 9, 2007
URL http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-iran9jul09,0,4961253.story
Quote
Quotes-start.png "There is little doubt that financial sanctions that punish Iran's elite and its business class are, over time, more likely to crimp President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's nuclear ambitions than any U.S. military action, which would only rally the Iranian people around their unpopular leader." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Economic sanctions should be imposed on Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.